Phonologically Conditioned Allomorphy in the Bamanankan Past Tense Morpheme /ra/
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18084626Anahtar Kelimeler:
Bamanankan, past tense morpheme, allomorphy, phonological conditioning, mande languagesÖzet
This study examines the allomorphic variation of the past tense morpheme /-ra/ in Bamanankan, a Mande language of the Niger-Congo family spoken predominantly in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Côte d’Ivoire. The primary objective of the study is to identify the range of past tense allomorphs in Bamanankan and to determine the phonological conditions governing their distribution. The data were collected through a mixed-method approach combining native speaker elicitation with corpus-based analysis, ensuring both controlled and naturally occurring linguistic evidence. A dataset consisting of 100 verbs was analyzed to assess the interaction between segmental phonology and past tense marking. The findings indicate that the Bamanankan past tense morpheme displays three distinct allomorphs: -ra, -na, and -la. The selection of these allomorphs is shown to be systematically conditioned by the phonological properties of the preceding segment. Specifically, -na occurs following nasal sounds, while -la appears after certain consonants, including r, t, w, c, and l. In contrast, -ra is realized after consonants such as s, b, f, y, j, g, and k. Furthermore, -ra can be considered the default or underlying form of the past tense morpheme due to its broader distribution and higher frequency across phonological environments. These results contribute to the description of Bamanankan morphophonology and offer insights into phonologically conditioned allomorphy within Mande languages more generally.
Referanslar
Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Farmer, A. K., & Harnish, R. M. (2010). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication (6th ed.). MIT Press.
Aronoff, M., & Fudeman, K. (2011). What is morphology? Wiley-Blackwell.
Bird, C., Hutchison, J., & Kanté, M. (1977). An ka Bamanankan kalan: Beginning Bambara. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Booij, G. (2005). The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford University Press.
Cao, P. (2023). Distinction and examples of morpheme, morph, and allomorph in English linguistics teaching. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 677, 323–331.
Haspelmath, M. (2019). The morph as minimal linguistic form. Morphology, 30(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-019-09344-4
Kilbury, J. (1973). The emergence of morphophonemics: A survey of theory and practice from 1876 to 1939. Lingua, 33, 235–252.
Lieber, R. (2009). Introducing morphology. Cambridge University Press.
Rahman, T. (2010). Linguistics for beginners: Basic concepts. Oxford University Press.
Tokar, A. (2012). Textbook in English language and linguistics (TELL) (Vol. 5). Peter Lang.
Wardhaugh, R. (1972). Introduction to linguistics. McGraw-Hill.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2025 Disiplinlerarası Dil ve Kültür Çalışmaları

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
